Skip to content

Corruption Ledger

The Public Ledger of Corruption

  • Home
  • About CL
  • Rumble
  • Video
  • corruption
    • corporate corruption
    • government corruption
    • leaks
    • Misinformation
    • Surveillance
  • cryptocurrency
  • Sanctions Feeds
    • All Sanctions Feeds
    • Canadian Sanctions
    • US Sanctions
  • Toggle search form

OFAC And FinCEN Announce Enforcement Actions Against Bittrex

Posted on December 1, 2022December 1, 2022 By 5amResearch No Comments on OFAC And FinCEN Announce Enforcement Actions Against Bittrex

Please note that Bittrex is a crypto exchange / trading platform. Crypto exchanges are like merchants that sell and trade cryptocurrencies, while cryptocurrencies (like Monero, Bitcoin, ZCash, etc.) are the ‘products’ sold by the merchants. The failure of a merchant does not entail that there is a failure in the product.

Cryptocurrency experts recommend that if you are going to own any cryptocurrency, you should never leave it on an exchange. Keep it on a hard wallet such as Ledger or Trezor.  

On October 11, 2022, the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) and Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) announced enforcement actions against Bittrex, Inc. (Bittrex), a privately-owned digital asset trading platform based in Bellevue, Washington, for apparent violations of anti-money laundering (AML) laws and of multiple sanctions programs. A settlement of over $24 million was announced by OFAC and a $29 million fine was announced by FinCEN. FinCEN will credit payment of the OFAC settlement amount toward Bittrex’s potential liability with FinCEN, meaning Bittrex will pay just over $29 million in total. Joint enforcement action between OFAC and FinCEN is uncommon-the settlements mark the first instance of parallel enforcement actions by OFAC and FinCEN in the digital asset sector.

The parallel settlements provide insight into certain sanctions and AML risks in the digital asset sector and illustrate how OFAC and FinCEN rules intersect and overlap in part: for example, that OFAC violations can trigger suspicious activity report filing obligations.

The actions follow a 2019 decision by the New York Department of Financial Services to reject Bittrex’s BitLicense application due in large part to an “inadequate” AML and OFAC compliance program.

OFAC Settlement

In its settlement with OFAC, Bittrex agreed to pay $24,280,829.20 to settle its potential liability for 116,421 alleged violations of multiple U.S. sanctions programs. Following a civil enforcement investigation, OFAC alleged that Bittrex failed to prevent users in Cuba, Iran, Sudan, Syria, and the Crimea region of Ukraine from using its digital asset exchange platform to engage in transactions totaling over $260 million between 2014 and 2017. The relevant sanctions programs broadly prohibited persons in the United States and U.S. persons located abroad from transacting with or providing services to individuals in those jurisdictions.

OFAC alleged that Bittrex had reason to know the users in question were located in jurisdictions subject to sanctions, based on available internet protocol (IP) address information and information on customers’ physical addresses. OFAC found that Bittrex was not screening customers or transactions for association with sanctioned jurisdictions until October 2017, after OFAC issued a subpoena to investigate potential sanctions violations. While Bittrex opened its digital asset platform to users in March 2014, OFAC found that Bittrex implemented a sanctions compliance program only in December 2015, and did not hire a third-party vendor to carry out its sanctions screening program until February 2016. This screening program initially involved only looking for matches against OFAC’s List of Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons (SDN List), not sanctioned jurisdiction matches. The OFAC enforcement action illustrates the importance of using all available data for economic sanctions compliance purposes, including data that is likely to be of particular relevance such as physical address and IP address information.

Notably, OFAC’s two other actions against major digital asset companies, BitPay and BitGo, also included apparent violations related to the company’s failure to screen IP address geolocation information. Geolocation tools, including IP address blocking tools, are also discussed in a number of places in OFAC’s Sanctions Compliance Guidance for the Virtual Currency Industry.

The Treasury Enforcement Release on the OFAC settlement noted as mitigating factors Bittrex’s “substantial cooperation in connection with OFAC’s investigation,” and the fact that Bittrex “swiftly took a series of subsequent remedial measures,” including implementing blockchain tracing software, that “significantly curtailed” the alleged violations, among other measures. Such factors resulted in a significantly lower penalty than OFAC might otherwise have imposed.

FinCEN Penalty

Following a civil enforcement investigation, FinCEN found willful violations of the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) and its implementing regulations by Bittrex. FinCEN imposed a penalty of $29,280,829.20 for these violations, though, as noted above, the agency will credit payment of the OFAC settlement amount to partly satisfy the FinCEN penalty. The FinCEN Consent Order (Consent Order) identified the “Presence or absence of prompt, effective action to terminate the violations upon discovery, including self-initiated remedial measures” as a key factor in its evaluation of the matter. The Consent Order noted that Bittrex began taking corrective actions to address its compliance failures beginning in late 2017, including updating its monitoring systems and verification processes, undergoing independent audits (as required under FinCEN rules), and significantly improving its suspicious activity reporting quality and timeliness. In light of the “substantial investments and improvements to [Bittrex’s] compliance program” following the time period of the violations, the Consent Order did not require additional remedial measures by Bittrex. Notably, the FinCEN investigation found that Bittrex acted willfully, but there has been no concurrent criminal enforcement action.

Under the BSA, Bittrex was required “to develop, implement, and maintain an effective Anti-Money Laundering (AML) program that is reasonably designed to prevent the [exchange platform] from being used to facilitate money laundering.”1 Additionally, under the BSA Bittrex was required to report transactions that Bittrex knew, suspected, or had reason to suspect were “suspicious,” as defined under BSA implementing regulations.2 According to the Consent Order, between 2014 and 2018 Bittrex failed to adequately maintain an AML program and “failed to develop and implement internal controls that were reasonably designed to assure compliance with the BSA’s suspicious activity reporting obligations.”

Specifically, FinCEN found that Bittrex utilized an inadequate transaction monitoring process, including relying “on two employees with minimal AML training and experience to manually review all of the transactions for suspicious activity,” rather than implementing widely available monitoring software tools. Bittrex also did not file any suspicious activity reports (SARs) between its founding in 2014 and May 2017, and filed only one SAR between May 2017 and November 2017. During this time, according to the Consent Order, a significant number of transactions associated with sanctioned jurisdictions occurred on Bittrex’s platform.

Additionally, FinCEN found that Bittrex failed to fully address risks associated with its services and products, including anonymity-enhanced cryptocurrencies (AECs). The Consent Order emphasizes the risks of AECs, indicating that FinCEN believes AML programs should address the unique risks presented by particular AECs. FinCEN specifically cites monero, zcash, pivx, and dash as examples of AECs, although a number of other digital assets may also fall into that category. According to FinCEN, “While Bittrex disabled privacy-enhancing features for most of the AECs it transacted in, Bittrex did not implement any other controls to manage the risks presented by AECs for which it was impossible to disable privacy-enhancing features ..” The Consent Order goes on to note that Bittrex did not have appropriate policies, procedures, and controls for “particularly challenging AECs, such as monero.” AECs have been a particular focus of FinCEN for a number of years. Among other features, AECs typically limit the amount of data on publicly available blockchains, impairing the effectiveness of blockchain analytics tools and similar compliance measures.

The Consent Order also found that Bittrex’s designation of its Chief Executive Officer as its AML compliance officer during the early stages of the company’s growth was inappropriate. The Consent Order was strongly critical of compliance resourcing and implementation, including Bittrex’s initial failure to implement automated transaction monitoring. One notable difference between the FinCEN Consent Order and the OFAC settlement is that, under the Consent Order, Bittrex agreed to waive any defense related to the statute of limitations. The OFAC settlement announcement is silent on whether Bittrex entered into a tolling agreement or waived its statute of limitations defenses.

***

The OFAC and FinCEN enforcement actions against Bittrex are the latest indications of an increased focus by the U.S. government on the sanctions and money laundering risks posed by digital assets. Companies operating in the virtual currency sector, whether startups or more established companies, should ensure that they comply with any applicable BSA requirements, including the establishment of an AML program and the filing of SARs. These companies should also ensure that they develop and implement risk-based controls to address OFAC sanctions compliance risks.

Footnotes

1. See 31 U.S.C. § 5318(h); 31 C.F.R. § 1022.210(a)).

2. See 31 U.S.C. § 5318(g)(1); 31 C.F.R. 1022.320(a)(2)).

Source: Mondaq

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
cryptocurrency, monero (XMR)

Post navigation

Previous Post: #JKSSB alleged job scam site: 14 locations raided, arrests made
Next Post: Ripple’s General Counsel Allegedly Blames SEC For BlockFi Bankruptcy

Related Posts

  • OFAC Sanctions Virtual Currency Mixer “Tornado Cash” cryptocurrency
  • Politician accuses FDIC of coercing banks into denying services to lawful crypto companies corporate corruption
  • The most hated cryptocurrency: Why are people flocking to Monero? corruption
  • Monero vs. Centralized Authority cryptocurrency
  • Is OKX/OKEX Exchange selling imaginary crypto? cryptocurrency
  • OFAC Announces Settlement with Virtual Currency Exchange Kraken cryptocurrency

Comment Cancel reply

  • Glenn Greenwald: Revealed – Mass Media Complicity in “Russian Disinformation” Fraud, w/ Matt Taibbi | SYSTEM UPDATE #30January 30, 2023
  • Reports of drone attacks in Iran and SyriaJanuary 29, 2023
  • AP: Ukraine Corruption Scandal; U.S. likely to OK sending Abrams tanksJanuary 29, 2023
  • Classified documents probe pushes Biden think tank into spotlightJanuary 29, 2023
  • British PM Sunak fires party chairman over tax bill allegationsJanuary 29, 2023
  • North Korea calls U.S. pledge of tanks to Ukraine ‘unethical crime’January 28, 2023
  • Usain Bolt fires business manager over Jamaica fraud caseJanuary 27, 2023
  • Canada’s Supreme Court gives mixed rulings on gun crime penaltiesJanuary 27, 2023
  • China, U.S. spar at WTO meeting over disputesJanuary 27, 2023
  • David J. Miller and Minnesota Independent Cooperative, Inc., Convicted in Multi-Million-Dollar Prescription Drug Diversion SchemeJanuary 27, 2023
  • Philippines to appeal ICC resumption of drug war probe: Thousands deadJanuary 27, 2023
  • Turkey says Sweden complicit in hate crime, NATO talks pointlessJanuary 26, 2023
  • Five Members and Associates of White Supremacist Gang Sentenced to Life in Prison for Racketeering, Kidnapping, and MurderJanuary 26, 2023
  • Justice Department Finds Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections Violates the Constitution By Incarcerating People Beyond Their Release DatesJanuary 25, 2023
  • Four Men Convicted of Engaging in a Child Exploitation EnterpriseJanuary 25, 2023
  • AP: Twitter faces lawsuits over unpaid rent for HQ offices in U.S., UKJanuary 24, 2023
  • U.S. Justice Department sues Google over digital advertising dominanceJanuary 24, 2023
  • Defence minister won’t say whether Canada is willing to send battle tanks to UkraineJanuary 23, 2023
  • Norway detains former top Wagner Group member seeking asylum, Andrey MedvedevJanuary 23, 2023
  • Finance companies and their directors fined for misconductJanuary 23, 2023
  • anti-government resistance
  • corruption
  • crime
  • dimwit crimes
  • economy
  • human rights
  • investigations
  • leaks
  • misinformation & censorship
  • political unrest
  • regulatory
  • sanctions
  • surveillance & privacy
  • war
  • who cares?

Corruption Ledger Follow

The Public ▇▇▇ Ledger of ▇▇▇ Corruption. https://t.co/wkobrEotQR

5amResearch
Corruption Ledger @5amresearch ·
4h

Cryptome content is reliable. Why is their @Twitter account permanently banned, however? https://twitter.com/Cryptome_org @Cryptome_org

Alex @Alex06944477

@MsQuitoSwarm @YouTube This seems to be legit, i read about the CIA-Operation "Aerodynamic" on the heise online german news platform
https://cryptome.org/2016/01/cia-ua-aerodynamic.pdf

Reply on Twitter 1622040205074075652 Retweet on Twitter 1622040205074075652 Like on Twitter 1622040205074075652
Retweet on Twitter Corruption Ledger Retweeted
System Update @systemupdate_ ·
2 Feb

.@RepMTG on protecting whistleblowers like Snowden & Assange:

“When a govt. is trying to stop the truth from being told… that’s something to pay attention to… We have to do everything we can to protect those whistleblowers who are risking their lives to tell the truth.”

Reply on Twitter 1621266228009394179 Retweet on Twitter 1621266228009394179 119 Like on Twitter 1621266228009394179 485
Retweet on Twitter Corruption Ledger Retweeted
Corruption Ledger @5amresearch ·
31 Jan

The most uplifting news in ages: #France brings new meaning to "Power to the People" - unionized energy workers give free power to low income people, cut off electricity for the powerful. #vivelafrance https://www.france24.com/en/europe/20230127-robin-hood-energy-strikers-give-free-power-to-french-schools-hospitals-low-income-homes

Reply on Twitter 1620285867926622208 Retweet on Twitter 1620285867926622208 3 Like on Twitter 1620285867926622208
Corruption Ledger @5amresearch ·
31 Jan

The most uplifting news in ages: #France brings new meaning to "Power to the People" - unionized energy workers give free power to low income people, cut off electricity for the powerful. #vivelafrance https://www.france24.com/en/europe/20230127-robin-hood-energy-strikers-give-free-power-to-french-schools-hospitals-low-income-homes

Reply on Twitter 1620285867926622208 Retweet on Twitter 1620285867926622208 3 Like on Twitter 1620285867926622208
Load More
  • UK government webinar on Russia trade sanctions & commercial services
    EU Sanctions - UK 1 day ago
  • US designates international sanctions evasion network
    EU Sanctions - UK 1 day ago
  • Security Council ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida Sanctions Committee Amends 29 Entries to Its Sancti...
    UN.org 2 days ago
  • Canada Amends Myanmar Sanctions: 6 Individuals Targeted and New Prohibition on Aviation Fuel
    Baker Mckenzie - Canada 2 days ago
  • Oil Price Cap Update: Refined Products
    OFSI 2 days ago
  • United States: Government Designates Russian Proxy Wagner Group as a Significant Transnational Crimi...
    Sanctions – Global Compliance News 2 days ago
  • Ukraine introduces a new set of sanctions against Russian and Belarusian companies
    Baker McKenzie UK 2 days ago
  • United States: OFAC issues amended Russia-related General Licenses and related FAQs
    Sanctions – Global Compliance News 2 days ago
  • Oil broker arrested over supply of 18,000 tonnes of diesel to North Korea
    EU Sanctions - UK 3 days ago
  • Switzerland implements the 9th package of EU sanctions against Russia
    Baker Mckenzie US 3 days ago
  • Statement by Minister Ng on U.S. request for dispute settlement panel on tariff rate quotas for Cana...
    Canada.ca 4 days ago
  • UK, US & Canada impose sanctions to mark anniversary of Myanmar coup
    EU Sanctions - UK 4 days ago
  • US Government Designates Russian Proxy Wagner Group as a Significant Transnational Criminal Organiza...
    Baker McKenzie UK 5 days ago
  • UK Court judgment on the impact of sanctions on litigation / judgments involving designated persons;...
    EU Sanctions - UK 5 days ago
  • Japan introduces further sanctions against Russia
    Baker Mckenzie US 5 days ago
  • AP: Ukraine Corruption Scandal; U.S. likely to OK sending Abrams tanks
    JapanToday 6 days ago
  • Classified documents probe pushes Biden think tank into spotlight
    JapanToday 6 days ago
  • British PM Sunak fires party chairman over tax bill allegations
    JapanToday 6 days ago
  • North Korea calls U.S. pledge of tanks to Ukraine 'unethical crime'
    JapanToday 7 days ago
  • OFAC Issues Amended Russia-Related General Licenses and Related FAQs
    Baker McKenzie UK 7 days ago
1
2
3
…
Next

–

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
  • Former Congressional Candidate Pleads Guilty to Wire Fraud and Falsification of Records government corruption
  • FTC & States Sue Google and iHeartMedia for Deceptive Ads Promoting the Pixel 4 Smartphone corruption
  • Airbus to pay $16 million fine to end French corruption probe (bribery involving Libya and Kazakhstan sales) corporate corruption
  • U.S. Complaint Agreement on Jackson, Mississippi Interim Solution to Water Crisis human rights
  • Ex-Tokyo Olympics official Takahashi granted ¥80 million bail in bribery case corruption
  • British PM Sunak fires party chairman over tax bill allegations government corruption

Copyright © 2022 Corruption Ledger. This web site contains no ads.